From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2006-01-04T22:31:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby projects and interfaces to revision control systems (Darcs vs. Cogito)

"Tom Copeland" <tom@infoether.com> writes:

>> Here's missing one important point: While SVN ist generally 
>> much friendlier then CVS, it's also more fragile. Especially 
>> the BerkeleyDB-backend should be avoided at any cost as 
>> berkdb is fragile on its own. 
>
> Yup, I've heard that too.  All RubyForge svn backends are using fsfs; I
> even compiled Svn --without-berkeley-db just to avoid any possibility of
> using that....

Bah, you can just admit you wanted to avoid all that library trouble! *g*

> Yours,
>
> Tom
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org