From: "Esteban Manchado Velázquez" <zoso@...>
Date: 2006-01-04T06:55:57+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby projects and interfaces to revision control systems

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:11:56AM +0900, Kirk Haines wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2006 9:03 am, Ollivier Robert wrote:
>=20
> > If you choose a distributed one, I'd like to turn you towards
> > Mercurial[1]. It is written in something easier to play with (Python),
> > very fast and does not share some of Darcs limitations (like having the
> > whole tree in memory at commit time).
>=20
> I'm just a fledgling user, slowly converting my projects to use Mercurial=
, but=20
> so far I have found it to work quite well for those things that I need.

    I just saw Mercurial, it looks cool.... but, why not FastCST? It's also
distributed, extensible... and written in Ruby :-)

--=20
Esteban Manchado Vel=E1zquez <zoso@foton.es> - http://www.foton.es
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDuvK+hYgK5b1UDsERAoj+AJ4mxsznC2EeoDoBonfBNzL8xMJhJgCdE8+C
kdtC48faDy11d6s8J9JHohc=
=4ehb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--