From: Tom Copeland <tom@...>
Date: 2006-01-04T03:57:48+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby projects and interfaces to revision control systems (Darcs vs. Cogito)

> Here's missing one important point: While SVN ist generally 
> much friendlier then CVS, it's also more fragile. Especially 
> the BerkeleyDB-backend should be avoided at any cost as 
> berkdb is fragile on its own. 

Yup, I've heard that too.  All RubyForge svn backends are using fsfs; I
even compiled Svn --without-berkeley-db just to avoid any possibility of
using that....

Yours,

Tom