From: Devin Mullins <twifkak@...>
Date: 2006-01-03T22:52:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Implicit block parameter?

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

> Hi --
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Ross Bamford wrote:
>
>> Wicked :) I can confirm that seems to work in 1.8 (though I had to 
>> make one change manually because the source is slightly different of 
>> course). I guessed it'd be something that would be reasonably easy 
>> (when you know how ;)) from the C side.
>>
>> FWIW +1 for inclusion in a future Ruby.
>
> You can submit it as an RCR if you wish, at http://www.rcrchive.net.
> (I'll vote "Strongly opposed", but don't let that stop you :-)

For what it's worth, I'll probably only vote "neutral" for the lack of 
readability it encourages (not naming the things). It's not as if people 
name their variables "it" a lot... :)

Devin