From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2001-07-06T10:06:53+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:17362] Re: SIGUSR1/2 ?

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:17346] Re: SIGUSR1/2 ?"
    on 01/07/06, Emil Ong <onge@mcs.anl.gov> writes:

|I'm happy with it now, but I could be happier if Ruby
|never set the signal handlers in the first place.

Well, it's required to handle signals within Ruby.  Hmm, maybe there's
something we can do (e.g. not overwriting non-SIG_DFL sighandlers).

							matz.