From: Peter Ertl <pertl@...>
Date: 2005-12-14T03:13:28+09:00
Subject: Re: ArachnoRuby -- a professional Ruby IDE

I personally think it's a pain...

arachno:

 last update: August(!)
 status: at most beta
 documentation: close to non-existent
 rails-support: hidden but there

komodo:
 ruby support:  very rudimentary, just to say "we can do ruby", 
                probably initiated by marketing wussies
 rails support: err, say what?

TextMate:
 mac-os-only *aarg*

On Windows, I suggest (and use)


http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.1.1-200509290840/eclipse-SDK-3.1.1-win32.zip

with

 http://sourceforge.net/projects/rubyeclipse

and

 http://www.eclipse.org/webtools

What you guys use?


Regards
Peter


> --- Urspr�ngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Jeff Wood <jeff.darklight@gmail.com>
> An: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
> Betreff: Re: ArachnoRuby -- a professional Ruby IDE
> Datum: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:57:00 +0900
> 
> Arachnos debugger is best-in-class...  it *BY FAR* out runs any of the
> other
> IDE debuggers...
> 
> j.
> 
> On 12/13/05, Christer Nilsson <janchrister.nilsson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > tony summerfelt wrote:
> > >i'm productive with both komodo and arachno-ruby...
> >
> > tony,
> >
> > can you tell as about any debugger speed differences between komodo and
> > arachno?
> >
> > what reasons do you see for using both?
> >
> > christer
> >
> > --
> > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> "Remember. Understand. Believe. Yield! -> http://ruby-lang.org"
> 
> Jeff Wood
>