From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2005-12-10T20:32:48+09:00
Subject: Re: lib for optional static typing

James Britt <james_b@neurogami.com> writes:

>>>the question imo not so much if static typing is useful
>>>or if dynamic typing is useful
>>>BUT when to use static typing.
>> The *real* question is where to get a type-system that is flexible
>> enough to analyze non-runtime dynamic parts of Ruby without spraying
>> class names all over. :-)
>> This is left as an exercise for the reader.
>
> BTW, there is a discussion on the Pragmatic Programmer mailing list
> right now about the pros/cons of static typing.

Except the archives are only accessible by members, which probably
read it already anyway. :-)

-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org