From: Harpo <trashcan@...>
Date: 2005-12-10T18:27:37+09:00
Subject: Re: rb_str_replace not public?

Daniel Berger wrote:

> Hi all,

Hi,

> 
> I wanted to use rb_str_replace for a destructive method in a C
> extension I'm using.  However, it doesn't appear to be public.  Why
> not?  And what should I use instead?
> 
> I poked around intern.h a bit, and saw a few potential candidates, but
> wasn't sure if there was a suitable replacement.  I suppose I could
> use rb_funcall, but that seems wrong, given that I know rb_str_replace
> exists in string.c.

Why not simply :

VALUE str1;     // string to replace
VALUE str2;     // replacement string

str1 = str2;
[ or, if you want a different object ]
str1 = rb_str_dup( str2 );

Maybe I missed something...

-- 
jigmepema <at> wanadoo <dot> fr