From: Mike Fletcher <lemurific+rforum@...>
Date: 2005-12-10T06:34:41+09:00
Subject: Re: different methods for initializing one object?

desmarm wrote:
> What you've proposed is a fine idea, but I think that it's important to
> be clear about your terminology.  Ruby doesn't currently have keyword
> arguments.  In the example that you've provided you are passing a hash
> with symbols for keys into the initialize method and _not_ using 
> keywords.

Oop, you're of course correct.  It's more "I can't believe it's not 
keyword arguments", now with 30% less calories than regular argument 
passing (yum, syntactic sugar!).

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.