From: James Britt <james_b@...>
Date: 2005-12-07T15:22:41+09:00
Subject: Re: injecting dynamic methods into a class

Trans wrote:
> Standards? Alright genius, why don't you use the the term "virtual
> class" then? 


Can we keep this civil?

Disagree all you like with David and his line of thought; I'm stunned, 
though, that anyone who has spent *any* time on this list would consider 
insulting him or his reasoning ability.

It's just wrong, Trans.


James


-- 

http://www.ruby-doc.org       - Ruby Help & Documentation
http://www.artima.com/rubycs/ - Ruby Code & Style: Writers wanted
http://www.rubystuff.com      - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com     - Playing with Better Toys
http://www.30secondrule.com   - Building Better Tools