From: Tanner Burson <tanner.burson@...>
Date: 2005-12-07T05:06:11+09:00
Subject: Re: Recursive Rake

------=_Part_10826_7316895.1133899563805
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 12/6/05, Jim Weirich <jim@weirichhouse.org> wrote:
>
> tanner.burson wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm working on a very large set of build tasks for several .NET
> > projects.
> > I've come up with a fairly simple rake script that with slight
> > modification
> > (differing includes, resources, output type, etc) is able to build any
> > of
> > the projects individually.
> >
> > The problem is that I'm now to the point of building the larger outer
> > project, which will in turn need to build several of the inner library
> > projects.  I'm unsure of the best way with Rake to handle this.
>
> There was a recent discussion about this on the Rake mailing list.
> Different folks approached it in different ways.  In particular, one
> person in that thread supports a HUGE build system using Rake.  See
> http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rake-devel/2005-December/thread.html for
> details.


Thanks for the information Jim.  I would definitely like to see more
information regarding your change for loading the entire dependency graph i=
n
at once, as that's more or less what I'd like to do.

-- Jim Weirich
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>


--
=3D=3D=3DTanner Burson=3D=3D=3D
tanner.burson@gmail.com
http://tannerburson.com   <---Might even work one day...

------=_Part_10826_7316895.1133899563805--