From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2005-12-07T02:52:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Subclassing Class.


On Dec 6, 2005, at 11:19 AM, David A. Black wrote:
>> The big elephant in the room seems to be Matz comments that the
>> semantics of a meta/singleton/eigen class might be implemented via  
>> some
>> mechanism other than a class, which would certainly stir the pot a  
>> bit.
>
> No elephant, from my perspective.  That's yet another reason (aside  
> from
> the general principle of respect for Matz's unique role) for not  
> having
> the terminology free-for-all.

I do see your point.  Keep the wordsmithing to the threads that are
*about* wordsmithing and use the "default" terminology in the day-to-day
threads.  Does that sound about right?  Eigenlivewithat :-)

Gary Wright