From: Curt Hibbs <curt.hibbs@...>
Date: 2005-12-06T22:57:38+09:00
Subject: Re: ArachnoRuby -- a professional Ruby IDE

------=_Part_5185_12592815.1133877452315
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks for the numbers. I had not actually timed it, but I knew there was a
speed difference.

Curt

On 12/6/05, Christer Nilsson <janchrister.nilsson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> curt.hibbs wrote:
> > On 12/5/05, Wayne Vucenic <nightphotos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Rails debugging, and it runs quickly enough to be quite usable.
> > I can confirm that the ArachnoRuby debugger is faster than Komodo's
> > debugger
> > (all the other stuff is about the same speed).
> >
> > Curt
>
> I compared ArachnoRuby with Komodo, using my solution for RubyQuiz #57.
> ArachnoRuby was 197 times faster !
>
> Debugging with ArachnoRuby seems to be about 50% slower than direct
> execution, which is completely acceptable.
>
> Thank you Wayne, for pointing out ArachnoRuby. Their web page wasn't
> very convincing, but the numbers above are.
>
> Christer
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>

------=_Part_5185_12592815.1133877452315--