From: nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...>
Date: 2005-12-06T17:47:03+09:00
Subject: Re: getting around access control

Hi,

At Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:04:39 +0900,
Ara.T.Howard wrote in [ruby-talk:169057]:
>    c.instance_eval{ p meth }
> 
> this throws an error, of course, but i'm too tired to remember how to work
> around it.

Hmmm, it seems to have changed unintentionally, together with
rb_funcall2(), at Dec 1.  Should I fix it?


Index: eval.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ruby/src/ruby/eval.c,v
retrieving revision 1.616.2.135
diff -U2 -p -u -r1.616.2.135 eval.c
--- eval.c	30 Nov 2005 15:51:05 -0000	1.616.2.135
+++ eval.c	6 Dec 2005 08:46:32 -0000
@@ -5901,11 +5901,11 @@ rb_call(klass, recv, mid, argc, argv, sc
     }
 
-    if (mid != missing && scope == 0) {
+    if (mid != missing) {
 	/* receiver specified form for private method */
-	if (noex & NOEX_PRIVATE)
+	if ((noex & NOEX_PRIVATE) && && scope == 0)
 	    return method_missing(recv, mid, argc, argv, CSTAT_PRIV);
 
 	/* self must be kind of a specified form for protected method */
-	if (noex & NOEX_PROTECTED) {
+	if ((noex & NOEX_PROTECTED) && scope < 3) {
 	    VALUE defined_class = klass;
 


-- 
Nobu Nakada