From: "Jonathan <zjll9@...> <zjll9@..." <zjll9@...>
Date: 2005-12-06T11:01:10+09:00
Subject: Re: injecting dynamic methods into a class


> 
> I agree with the name change.  However, the class isn't instantiable, so 
> using self won't work.  I will change this to a module though.  (you can 
> call methods of a module without mixing it in right?)

Oops.  I guess 'self' in that context refers to the module or class?? 
Yea, that would be more robust (or at least more consistent with 
write-once.  changing the name of a class or module would require 
changing all static method names (are these called class methods in 
ruby??) unless self is used.  Is that the reason you think it's more 
robust or was it something else?


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.