From: Hampton <hcatlin@...>
Date: 2005-12-05T05:57:32+09:00
Subject: Re: Weird Numbers (#57) Solution

Ryan-

It was supposed to be a funny statement. I even used a ;)

And of course calling my "exhaustive" (hint in the name) a *tad* slower
is absolutely, 100% absurdist.

I used the wrong AO list as mentioned in my other response. I apologize
to all those who my not paying attention to "primitive weird numbers"
and "weird numbers" hurt in the process.

This quiz is for *fun* not competition.

-hampton.

PS: For further clarification, about 50% of this message is also
supposed to be somewhat amusing.