From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2005-12-01T23:23:09+09:00
Subject: Re: [BUG] string range membership

Hi --

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Bob Showalter wrote:

> David A. Black wrote:
>>> No, that's fine. More efficient would be
>>>
>>>  !('1'..'10').find({|x| x == '2'}).nil?
>> 
>> 
>> I don't think find takes a hash argument :-)  Also, why not lose the !
>> and the .nil? ?
>
> a) The fingers get ahead of the brain :)
> b) To get a true/false. But not needed, of course.

You can do:

   enum.any? {|e| ... }

to get a true/false result.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net