From: Jim Weirich Date: 2005-11-29T12:19:07+09:00 Subject: Re: AOP in Ruby ... m-lists wrote: > Christian Leskowsky wrote: > > I thought aspects were baked into the language. You just have to > re-open a > > definition like: [... example elided ...] > That's not exactly the same thing as AOP is it (or a very special case)? > I mean, with AOP you should be able to define things like pointcuts to > apply advice to etc. What you described feels very much like a around > advice applied to a _single_ method. It is, but creating a general solution out of that is not a difficult exercise. That's the point, AOP lies very close to the surface of Ruby code. -- Jim Weirich -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.