From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2005-11-29T02:52:28+09:00
Subject: Re: string range membership


Bob Showalter wrote:

> How about something like Enumerable#produces?, or Enumerable#yields?
>
> Then perhaps start deprecating Enumerable#member?
>
> So for a range, one could use r.include?(obj) to test for obj between
> the endpoints, and r.yields?(obj) to test whether r.succ ever yields obj.
>
> Enumerable#=== becomes an issue (case statement), right?

A nice alternative bit of thinking, Bob. At least you are making some
sense.

As for the rest of the gibberish being posted here, which btw has been
the same flap for years, forget it. It's hopeless. You all will be
right back to were you were two years ago, two years from now.

Adios,
T.