From: Yukihiro Matsumoto Date: 2005-11-24T00:14:56+09:00 Subject: Re: [BUG] string range membership Hi, In message "Re: [BUG] string range membership" on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:57:41 +0900, "Warren Brown" writes: |> I'd argue that it is not a bug, as there is no unique |> isomorphie from strings to integers. | | I have to disagree. For your information, member? used to iterate over items to check membership. But since confusion between include? and member?, they were merged. The point is Ranges are used both for ranges and intervals. Sometimes users want it to behave like a range surrounded by begin/end values. Sometimes they want it to behave like a set of values, that #each produces. I'd like to care this issue, but I haven't know the right way to solve it yet. Perhaps we should provide both membership method, with right names for each. Any ideas? matz.