From: "Molitor, Stephen L" <Stephen.L.Molitor@...>
Date: 2005-11-16T07:47:15+09:00
Subject: Re: toplevel namespace justification

> So what about the alternate possibility of "requiring into" 
> an arbitrary namespace?

Related to that, will 1.9 / 2.0 have the ability to extend or modify
core classes but only within one's own 'namespace' (however 'namespace'
is defined - a module, or some new construct)?

Steve