From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2005-11-16T06:57:17+09:00
Subject: Re: toplevel namespace justification

Some good points. And while I am inclinded to agree Kirk's comment:

    "I don't want to offer them for inclusion in Facets
     because *I* don't want to have to have a
     dependency on such a large collection when I'm
     only using a few bits of it"

raises an interesting conundrum. If I were to address this by splitting
out most of the class/modules of Facets into indivdual projects, then
many of those very same toplevel namespaces would get used up anyway.

B/c of issues like this I get the feeling that there might be a better
way than the present convention (which appears to be basically an
adaptation from Perl).

T.