From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2005-11-15T23:12:38+09:00
Subject: Re: unexpected behaviour in Pathname?

In article <91B61F46-ABB8-48E7-BB2D-97A3DBE87C3C@sms.ed.ac.uk>,
  Matthew Smillie <M.B.Smillie@sms.ed.ac.uk> writes:

> I realise that I can solve this by doing (p + q).read inside the  
> block, but surely this isn't the desired behaviour of Pathname#each?

It is intended for consistency to Dir.entries.

Use Pathname#children instead.

Note that Pathname#children doesn't generates "." and "..".
I hope you don't need them.
-- 
Tanaka Akira