From: Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Date: 2005-11-15T19:45:43+09:00
Subject: Re: rake : rakefile vs. rakefile.rb

itsme213 schrieb:
> Thanks, Jim (and Stefan). It works fine now.
> 
> "Jim Weirich" <jim@weirichhouse.org> wrote in message 
> news:200511141308.28436.jim@weirichhouse.org...
> On Monday 14 November 2005 12:45 pm, Stefan Lang wrote:
> 
>>The solution for Rake would be to replace the line (in lib/rake.rb)
>>
>>load @rakefile
>>
>>with:
>>
>>load File.expand_path(@rakefile)
> 
> Thanks for the insight on this problem.  The suggested change has been
> committed to rake's CVS repository and a beta version is available using:
> 
>    gem install rake --source http://onestepback.org/betagems

I find it remarkable that the author of rant is posting patches for the 
"competing" rake. Thanks Stefan!

Regards,
Pit