From: John Lam <drjflam@...>
Date: 2005-11-11T07:10:52+09:00
Subject: Re: My usage of const_missing and method_missing

------=_Part_17801_10009872.1131660650321
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

>
> It's nice, but is there a way to reflect on the .NET target and get at
> least
> the methods all-at-once rather than using method missing? That way you
> have
> the advantage of respond_to? etc. rather than having to refer use a metho=
d
> first.
>

I could get the methods all at once, but I use method_missing to determine
which shims I should dynamically construct. Each shim carries some amount o=
f
overhead associated with it in terms of both time and space. I'd like to
avoid constructing shims for methods that are never called.

Cheers,
-John
http://www.iunknown.com

------=_Part_17801_10009872.1131660650321--