From: Robert Klemme <bob.news@...>
Date: 2005-11-07T18:02:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby making inroads at big corporation... small anecdote.

Daniel Schierbeck wrote:
> Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>> Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:
>> 
>> 
>>> James Britt wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Jacob Fugal wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11/4/05, Ara.T.Howard <Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Perhaps the real sign of Big Corporate Acceptance will be when
>>>>>>> people start
>>>>>>> referring to RUBY.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Then we'll have to invent a backronym for it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Rapid Understanding Before Yesterday
>>>>>>> Really Ugly Bastards Yodeling
>>>>>>> RUBY: Uplifting Beautiful Yammering
>>>>>>> RUBY unmasks brutal youth
>>>>>>> Rarely unnatural block yielding
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> you obviously don't work for the government - otherwise you'd
>>>>>> know that an
>>>>>> acronym must be double nested or self referring to be adequately
>>>>>> obtuse ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> RUBY: Upholding the Beauty of YAML
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> RUBY ultimately begets YARV
>>> 
>>> Ranguage Undertaken By Yukihiro
>> 
>> 
>> RUBY Ultimately Bedazzles You
>> 
>> 
> 
> Rizzley Ubizzles Bewizzle my Yizzle :D

http://www.brunching.com/cgi/acronymer.cgi?acronym=ruby

(try multiple times)

    robert