From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2005-11-05T04:54:52+09:00
Subject: Re: <ANN> TeSLa, a Domain Specific Language for Unit Testing

Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@free.fr> writes:

> Selon obscured by code <javierg1975@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thank you all for your responses, I though on posting here some of my
>> opinions but it turned out to be too big so I decided I'd better blog
>> about it. You can find the article here
>>
> http://www.theniceweb.com/JaviersBlog/2005/11/ruby-20-and-tesla-upcoming-syntax_04.html
>
> I know it's not exactly what you asked for when you've written this post, but
> your comments on your blog about possible mandatory parentheses in Ruby2
> concern me. Can people read Javier's blog and comment on that part? (if
> possible by saying that it ain't gonna happen so!) Thanks in advance.

I don't think the behavior will be changed compared to 1.8.2:
    assert raises(ZeroDivisionError)
and 
    attr_accessor :items
will stay valid.  (IANM, but I'd be very sad if parens are enforced.)

> Christophe Grandsire.
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org