From: Domenico De Felice Date: 2005-11-05T03:47:09+09:00 Subject: Re: Some comments on new 1.9 features Nikolai Weibull wrote: [CUT] > The funny thing about this example is that the whole point of having > ";;" be "end" is that you could write > > class Foo > def foo; "foo" ;; > end > Why don't use just : for single statement methods? class Foo def foo: "foo" end or in this case class Foo: def foo: "foo" It sounds more expressive than do .. ;; -- Domenico