From: mental@...
Date: 2005-11-05T01:40:20+09:00
Subject: Re: What about {:a => "a", :b => "b"} argument

Quoting Nicolas Rassat <nicolas.rassat@free.fr>:

> Ahem... Looks it works
>
> But it's almost 50% more times of computing. So why don't use the
> :@a
> syntax (yes in this case it's 50% more times writing... ;-)

Well, it could be argued against on the grounds that using :@a
exposes internal implementation details.

-mental