From: "Mauricio Fernández" <mfp@...>
Date: 2005-11-03T02:26:53+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-dev summary 27393-27541

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:52:57PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
> That's similar to what I did in Ruby Behaviors, but with an "off"
> switch for the non-block version:
> 
>   # Block
>   b.adopt do
>     ...
>   end
> 
>   # No block
>   b.adopt
>   ...
>   b.desist
> 
> (where b is a Behavior object)
> 
> Of course, Ruby Behaviors had some issues, especially thread safety --
> which is what got the discussion going about selector namespaces at
> RubyConf 2001 :-)

Wasn't Ruby Behaviors dynamically scoped though?
It seems Ruby's selector namespaces are more likely to be static.

-- 
Mauricio Fernandez