From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2005-11-02T23:47:07+09:00
Subject: Re: Anonymous methods, blocks etc. (Cont. 'default block params')


Trans wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Ruby's model? I realize this is significant change, and not backwards
> compatible.

Actually that's not exactly true. It is only not backwards comapitable
if preexisting keyword/methods are used. Namely:

  lambda { ... }

Just don't reuse that but use new term as I also suggest, like 'dfn'
and matz' '->'.

T.