From: Lyle Johnson Date: 2005-11-02T22:18:22+09:00 Subject: Re: Problem installing FxRuby On 11/2/05, Pit Capitain wrote: > Who is responsible for those names? Could they be changed to something > which is easier to understand, maybe > > fxruby 1.4.2 (mswin32 binaries) > fxruby 1.4.2 (sources) > > Not sure about the second one. I remember that I once had chosen the > wrong option, too, because their meaning wasn't clear to me. If I recall correctly, they are predefined constants in the RubyGems library, constants that you use when you're writing the Gem specification. So no, I didn't get to pick the names, that's a RubyGems thing. I agree that the meanings of the names aren't as clear as they could be...