From: Jim Weirich Date: 2005-10-31T14:20:10+09:00 Subject: Re: rake : rakefile vs. rakefile.rb On Saturday 29 October 2005 06:27 pm, itsme213 wrote: > Why does rake not recognize "rakefile.rb" as a default rakefile? I just had > to change the file name to just "rakefile" to get it to work (which messes > up editors etc. that look for ".rb" extensions). Seems to work for me. $ ls rakefile.rb $ cat rakefile.rb task :default do puts "Running rakefile.rb" end $ rake (in /home/jim/pgm/rake/dotrb) Running rakefile.rb $ -- -- Jim Weirich jim@weirichhouse.org http://onestepback.org ----------------------------------------------------------------- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)