From: Tanner Burson Date: 2005-10-27T06:31:19+09:00 Subject: Re: nested def's ------=_Part_13371_28823427.1130362275291 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 10/26/05, Daniel Sch=FCle wrote: > > well, I played a little and found out that though b is def'ined within a > one could call b. Same applies for c, and bar within a class as well. > it behaves as def's are flatten'ed into one namespace And that's exactly what is happening. The only thing you change by nesting them that way is the point at which they def statement is processed, nothin= g more. -- =3D=3D=3DTanner Burson=3D=3D=3D tanner.burson@gmail.com http://tannerburson.com <---Might even work one day... ------=_Part_13371_28823427.1130362275291--