From: Edward Faulkner <ef@...>
Date: 2005-10-27T04:45:40+09:00
Subject: Re: how private is private in ruby?

--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:32:36AM +0900, Peter Ertl wrote:
> Why is this allowed / possible?
> $ puts ks.send(:key)
>
> so I can just use [public] for _everything_ as well, right?

While it may or may not be a good idea that #send subverts access
control, your choice of example betrays a misunderstanding of the
meaning of "private".

"private" is not intended as a security measure.  It's an
encapsulation technique.  You'll find this is generally true in other
languages as well.  You can certainly subvert "private" in C++.

"private" exists only to tell other programmers which methods they
really shouldn't be calling. =20

regards,
Ed

--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDX9w/nhUz11p9MSARAoseAKDJs++0QGFFQNAFdi09ZtjC5G9v5QCfeXDA
cgwtpmBtEyFhkla6OMp+Bvk=
=sHvJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo--