From: Shannon Fang <xrfang@...>
Date: 2005-10-25T14:57:38+09:00
Subject: Re: What's your Ruby Number? (self.to_i)

I got 534, higher than matz... hahahhah.

Shannon


>From: Joe Van Dyk <joevandyk@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
>To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
>Subject: Re: What's your Ruby Number? (self.to_i)
>Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:18:21 +0900
>
>On 10/24/05, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
> > On Oct 24, 2005, at 9:20 PM, Hal Fulton wrote:
> >
> > > I offer this in the spirit of the old "purity test" and the
> > > "nerdity test" that was derived therefrom.
> > >
> > > Don't take it *too* seriously. All point weights are strictly
> > > my opinion and are subject to change.
> > >
> > >
> > > Version 1.0 follows... cut, paste, run. Or just cut and run.
> >
> > Wow, I'm probably the lowest rated guy here:
> >
> > "That's all... your Ruby Geek status is measured at 535.
> > Have a great day, and keep coding!"
> >
> > Well Hal, you certainly helped me fill out my list of, "I should do
> > that!"s...
>
>phhbt.. I got 29 and I've worked on Ruby stuff about full-time for a
>little over a year.
>