From: Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date: 2005-10-22T10:32:09+09:00
Subject: Re: A comparison by example of keyword argument styles

En r�ponse � itsme213 :
> 
> Their number is part of the signature (rather than their position(s)).
> 

OK. That's about what I meant :) .

>  > Keyword arguments, being just a
>  > part of the name of a method, must be explicitly marked as such
>  > by the developer, and shouldn't be allowed to be left out by the
>  > user, just like you can't leave out the name of a method.
> 
> I have always preferred this semantics.
> 
> It also means keyword argument names must be available through reflection.
> 

Indeed, very good remark.
-- 
Christophe Grandsire.

http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr

You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.