From: Gavin Sinclair Date: 2005-10-21T08:11:59+09:00 Subject: Re: Why Write Ruby Docs? (was Re: [SUMMARY] Text Image (#50)) James Britt wrote: > > Is there a reason to believe the documentation is treated differently > > from the source code of which it's part? If the documentation is "Ruby > > Licence", which I expect it is, what implication does that have for > > copyright? > > Could someone sell a book that included the text from the std-lib docs? > Would the book have to be released under Ruby's license (whatever that > means)? I don't know. Good way of looking at it. Gavin