From: ES Date: 2005-10-21T06:36:53+09:00 Subject: Re: [OT] New Language Brian Mitchell wrote: > On 10/20/05, Tom Copeland wrote: > >>On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote: >> >>>Ryan Leavengood wrote: >>> >>>>On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 10/20/05, David A. Black wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Tim Hammerquist wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the >>>>>>>>source tree for release... >>>>> >>>>>[snip] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>Might be too hard, though. >>>>>> >>>>>>And a bit britt-le. >>>>> >>>>>Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite >>>>>users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep." >>>> >>>>And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool >>>>features in your language. >>> >>>And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone. >> >>At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened. >> >>Tom >> >> >> >> > > > This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore. It makes your brian hurt? Not to worry, it will likely be gone like the wind come morrow. The quistion is, though, will anyone actually hammer out his specification or if it will be all just left as the produce of this mellow afternoon? A worthwhile idea albeit some might balk from it due to its uberlanguage philosophy. Did I leave anyone out? Any of those bad enough for this to end yet? > Brian. E