From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@...>
Date: 2005-10-20T23:26:58+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] [RCR] Cut-based AOP

+1

I only have one concern: I think the syntax is kinda weird. It resembles 
the class definition syntax, but I can't see why it should. When you 
write "class A < B" you're saying "class A inherits from class B" or 
"class A is affected by class B". If we apply the same to "cut A < B", 
it would be "cut A is affected by class B", which isn't the case. Why 
not use "cut A > B", "cut A affects class C". The singleton syntax could 
be like this "cut >> obj".


Just my .16 Yen
Daniel