From: Sean O'Halpin <sean.ohalpin@...>
Date: 2005-10-15T02:45:35+09:00
Subject: Re: Default argument values for blocks

On 10/14/05, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Default argument values for blocks"
>    on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:31:15 +0900, Sean O'Halpin <sean.ohalpin@gmail.com> writes:
>
> |For instance_eval, how about simply
> |
> |  instance_eval(*args, &block)
> |
> |i.e. if it has a block, then the arguments are passed to it.
> |e.g.
> |
> |  instance_eval(1,2,3) {|a,b,c| ...}
> |  instance_eval(1,2,3, &block)
>
> I will supply something behave like this, but with a different name
> from instance_eval.  I'm thinking of instance_exec() right now.
>
>                                                        matz.

How about instance_call()? On the analogy with Proc.call().

Sean