From: "Ara.T.Howard" Date: 2005-10-14T21:39:42+09:00 Subject: Re: Challenging Project ... Need a deep guru to provide enlightenment. On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Jeff Wood wrote: > Actually I wrote a new chunk of code based on Ara's snippet that for direct > calls does EXACTLY what I want it to ... I'll be posting it later today ... > I just have to deal with stuff like blah.call.call2.call3 ... which I don't > believe will currently work ... I'll have to dig through and see how DRb > makes it work ... DRbObjects don't work ... call methods or call > respond_to? ... they are NOT calls on the remote object ... I don't believe > ANY call on a proxied object should be local, they should ALL be passed over > the wire ( and yes, I know that at least id and send can't, but everything > other than those ). I really think you guys will like the stuff I have ... > So far, I'm calling it Roxy ... > Thanks. > j. sounds neat - now that i understand what you're after. i guess that approach would be find so long as one has __some__ method to determine what the heck the object 'really' like: proxy.__drb #=> the obj proxy.__drb? #=> true but i like the sound of making drb objects as close to local ones at possible. look forward to seeing what you come up with. -a -- =============================================================================== | email :: ara [dot] t [dot] howard [at] noaa [dot] gov | phone :: 303.497.6469 | Your life dwells amoung the causes of death | Like a lamp standing in a strong breeze. --Nagarjuna ===============================================================================