From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2005-10-14T19:16:54+09:00
Subject: Re: Text Image (#50)

James Edward Gray II wrote:

> >> Gavin, that second link looks like ready to put online RDoc.  Any
> >> reason we don't have it on ruby-doc.org?
> >>
> >
> > Wow!  Them's some pretty long links!  I take it there are some docs
> > for
> > enumerator in CVS and they could do with some translation into RDoc.
> > OK, I'll make that my next target.
>
> Gavin, those are 1.9 docs.  If that's a problem, just let me know and
> I'll build a patch to add them to Ruby 1.8 and see if I can get it
> committed.

The stuff on ruby-doc.org/{stdlib,core} is generated from 1.8 source
and library code, so 1.9 stuff won't appear there.  There's no reason,
however, that other, arbitrary, documentation can't be hosted on
ruby-doc.org.

So if it's appropriate that it should appear in 1.8, I'd certainly
encourage you to make a patch and get it committed.

Cheers,
Gavin