From: Jeff Wood <jeff.darklight@...>
Date: 2005-10-14T09:12:59+09:00
Subject: Re: Challenging Project ... Need a deep guru to provide enlightenment.

------=_Part_10749_18307957.1129248776728
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Does this make any sense in the context of wanting something I can script
remotely against?

DRb has a disposition that you have to know what you are calling remotely
before you can call it ...

And, if you are wanting to pass a remote object into a function, you can't
do any duck-type checking because respond_to? is based on DRbObject, not th=
e
remote object it is to proxy.

Anyways, that's the goal of the project, simply to be able to use DRb
transparently, completely transparently.

I look forward to any further suggestions you have, thanks for what you've
provided already.

j.


On 10/13/05, Jeff Wood <jeff.darklight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, sorry.
>
> I mean ...
>
> a =3D 1
> b =3D Proxy.new( a )
>
> or
>
> a =3D "Hello, World"
> b =3D Proxy.new( a )
>
> or
>
> a =3D MyComplicatedObject.new
> b =3D Proxy.new( a )
>
> ...
>
> sorry for the mis-type ...
>
> j.
>
>
> On 10/13/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi --
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> >
> > > a =3D String::new 'forty-two'
> > > b =3D Proxy::new a
> >
> > That's not the original problem, though. It was:
> >
> > a =3D String
> > b =3D Proxy.new(a)
> >
> > I guess you have the same hunch I do, that it was actually meant to be
> > String.new.
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> > --
> > David A. Black
> > dblack@wobblini.net
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "http://ruby-lang.org -- do you ruby?"
>
> Jeff Wood
>
>


--
"http://ruby-lang.org -- do you ruby?"

Jeff Wood

------=_Part_10749_18307957.1129248776728--