From: Ezra Zygmuntowicz Date: 2005-10-13T01:38:47+09:00 Subject: Re: Default argument values for blocks On Oct 12, 2005, at 7:59 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Ara.T.Howard wrote: > >> but >> >> method bool ? 42 : (0b101010) { "block" } >> >> is valid now. >> >> ':' is nice on the eyes though. maybe '::' >> > > maybe :-(foo = "bar") {...}, where :-( is pronounced "sadly" > >> >> > SCNR, > Hugh > > > What about: ~:(foo = "bar") {...} ? -Ezra Zygmuntowicz Yakima Herald-Republic WebMaster http://yakimaherald.com 509-577-7732 ezra@yakima-herald.com