From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
Date: 2005-10-12T23:59:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Default argument values for blocks

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> but
> 
>   method bool ? 42 : (0b101010) { "block" }
> 
> is valid now.
> 
> ':' is nice on the eyes though.  maybe '::'

maybe :-(foo = "bar") {...}, where :-( is pronounced "sadly"
> 
        SCNR,
        Hugh