From: Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@...>
Date: 2005-10-09T06:43:38+09:00
Subject: Re: bang methods

On 10/8/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
>
> keep! implies keep.  I think keep (without the !) would be an inplace
> operation already.  Or maybe keep_all { <test> }.

I vote we add keep_all or keep_if, and make select! a synonym for it.
Just like delete_if and reject!.

I feel symmetry and consistency is better than sticking to ideals of
the English language. Of course I think select! makes as much sense as
reject!, so for me it is a moot point.

Ryan