From: Dirk Meijer <hawkman.gelooft@...>
Date: 2005-09-30T14:11:24+09:00
Subject: Re: IBM vs. Microsoft vs. ... Ruby?

------=_Part_6067_8830230.1128057050638
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

i've been using SciTE for a while now, and i like it, just one things
bothers me:
/#{variable}/ is seen as a comment instead of a regular expression..
and just for that, i'd switch editors. oh yeah, and it's printing doesn't
really look very good.
greetings, Dirk.

 2005/9/30, Corey Lawson <corey.ssf.lawson@gmail.com>:
>
> ArachnoRuby works fine as a Ruby "IDE". There isn't really an IDE for
> Rails
> per se, but how hard can it be to edit code in ArachnoRuby (or SciTE, or
> UltraEdit or even Notepad), keep 2 DOS windows open (one to do "scaffold
> generate ...", and the other to start and stop webbrick), and a web
> browser
> window to hit the web pages? At least for development, there is generally
> not much need to restart webbrick.
>
>
>
> On 9/29/05, bonefry <bellarchitects@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > there are 2 important things missing from Ruby right now: a fast VM and
> > a good IDE. Until you have those you really cannot do "Enterprise
> > Scale" applications.
> > But maybe in the future.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

------=_Part_6067_8830230.1128057050638--