From: Sean O'Halpin <sean.ohalpin@...>
Date: 2005-09-25T11:02:15+09:00
Subject: Re: "The class that it is mixed in to..."

My point was that Ruby has two ways of 'mixing in' a module -
inclusion and extension. We already have words that exactly describe
the relationship between the including/extending class/module and the
included/extended module.

Why invent an ambiguous alternative?

Sean

P.S. Hi David - when are you back in London?