From: Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Date: 2005-09-25T04:46:41+09:00
Subject: Re: swiggery

Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@ieee.org> wrote:
> is probably overkill. SWIG is best for large libraries where you're 
> willing to settle for the un-Rubyness of the wrapped API in return for 
> having the wrappers automatically generated. For two functions, I'd 

Thanks for the reply, Steve, and particularly for that bit - I hadn't
quite caught on to that, and thought it was merely a matter of tweaking the
..i file to get rubyish API out of SWIG. I'll go with handbinding this
time, I think.

martin